One regulatory cycle. One trusted record.
Connect every draft, source, comment, decision and outcome in one system. Transparent AI provides assistance while people remain in control.
Administrative burden reduction
Assess alternativesRegulatory work is too important to depend on fragmented evidence.
Today, materials, calculations, feedback and decisions are spread across Word, Excel and email. People carry the responsibility while the process offers little continuity.
Multiple versions of the same document circulate in parallel.
Lost in edit historyCalculations remain separated from the proposal they support.
Detached from the recordComments and responses remain outside the working record.
Never traced backWhat this causes in practice
Unclear current version
Teams spend time identifying which document is current and what changed.
Issues discovered too late
Missing evidence and methodological gaps surface only before submission.
Decisions cannot be traced
It is unclear which comment changed the proposal and why.
One record connects the full legislative cycle.
Every draft, assumption, comment, decision and outcome remains connected to the same legislative record.
Evidence
A reference value enters the case with its source and date.
One system.Two views of the same legislative case.
Different groups work on the same legislative case. Each role sees the information and actions relevant to its responsibilities.
Do the right level of scoping, drafting and analysing. And make it defensible before submission.
Regulatory teams are expected to produce defensible materials. Until now, relying on Word, Excel and email meant direct data access and timely quality feedback were missing.
The Better Regulation Platform replaces separated tools with one platform that guides the drafter through every step. It shows what is required, connects reliable evidence, keeps contributions synced and traceable, and flags gaps before submission.
Define the scope for an efficient process.
Not every regulatory initiative requires the same depth of analysis. The platform guides you toward a proportionate scope from the start.
- Identify relevant impact areas with an intelligent proportionality check.
- See the steps, evidence and stakeholders required for this case.
- Understand upcoming effort and dependencies early.
The process narrows the work without losing what matters.
Get quality feedback before submission.
Completeness and methodological quality become visible while you work.
- Track what is finished and what still needs attention.
- Strengthen estimates with standardised methods, reference values and supporting data.
- Keep consultations, assumptions and sources attached to the assessment.
Submission readiness
Automate routine tasks and keep every decision reviewable.
The platform can pre-fill routine inputs and suggestions. People review what is ultimately used.
See the full portfolio, review consistently and follow the response to every opinion.
The RIA Commission is expected to protect quality and consistency across the entire process. Today it often lacks a complete lifecycle view and a reliable way to follow what happens after an opinion is issued.
The platform brings submissions, reviews and responses into one record. The RIA Commission can see where quality issues arise, whether an opinion led to changes, and how results compare with the original forecast.
See the whole system without losing the critical detail.
A portfolio-level view shows where every regulatory initiative stands and where attention is needed.
- Track status, missing inputs and upcoming review points across ministries.
- Spot bottlenecks, delays and unusual patterns before they become systemic.
- Move from a high-level summary into evidence, stakeholders and methods when needed.
Summary to depth, in one click.
Review every assessment against a consistent standard.
Structured review tools make quality expectations visible and comparable.
- Apply common criteria for methodology, data quality and proportionality.
- Compare assessments across ministries and over time.
- Record the reasoning, evidence and decision behind each opinion.
Comparable structure makes differences visible and discussable.
Opinions stay visible together with the response.
Comments from the Commission and from reviewing bodies are connected directly to the legislative material they concern.
Designed for trusted work in public administration.
AI assistance is only valuable when people can understand and verify it.
Transparent AI assistance
Traceable sources, explainable logic and human approval.
Accountability
Responsibilities, decisions and version history remain auditable.
Role-appropriate access
The right depth for each user without fragmenting the record.
Test the platform on real regulatory work.
We are looking for drafters and RIA Commission members who want to test the workflow and influence how the platform develops.
- A focused session based on your role
- No preparation required
- Your feedback directly shapes the product